Social Work Examination Services (SWES) Human Behavior Practice Test

Why might a social worker choose not to intervene significantly in a client's regression?

1. The regression is a temporary state

2. The client is happy with the regression

3. The regression allows for problem-solving

4. The regression is damaging to the client's progress

The correct answer is: The regression allows for problem-solving

A social worker might choose not to intervene significantly in a client's regression because, in certain contexts, the regression allows for problem-solving. This means that the temporary return to earlier coping mechanisms or behaviors may provide the client an opportunity to address underlying issues or to explore feelings and behaviors more deeply. By not immediately intervening, the social worker respects the client’s process, allowing them to work through these regressed states to learn and grow. For instance, a client might revert to childlike behaviors as a way to cope with overwhelming stress. This period of regression can enable them to address unresolved issues from their past in a safe environment, fostering a deeper understanding of their current challenges. As they reflect on these experiences, they may discover new insights that contribute to their overall growth and healing. The other options present scenarios where intervention is typically warranted. If the regression is a temporary state, it might be reasonable to allow it to run its course without interference, but it also denotes the need for monitoring. When a client expresses happiness with their regression, it raises questions about their long-term coping and may suggest a need for support in processing these feelings. Lastly, recognizing that regression is damaging to a client's progress would typically necessitate significant intervention to help reintegrate healthier coping